Hey guys it seems its very hard for some judges to give a good explanation and some seem to disagree with them as well I thought of a new layout that could be used in the judging instead of just a remark section. Why not make judges choose between the categories of the best OVERALL for example.
NASTNASO vs NASTNASO
X EXTERIOR
X INTERIOR
ENGINE X
X UNDERCARRIAGE
TRUNK X
WINNER: NASTNASO
comments: NASTNASO's car is just sick nuff said :-)
If you lay it out where the judges would have to choose a winner no TIE crap in each of the sections ot would choose a clear winner each time and then let the make their remarks in the comment section below. I have read a few past results that some judges have given one cars more categories but in the end says they are voting for the other person. Makes no sense. Overall judges do an awesome job and it must take a lot of time to be one and this way will make it quicker and more generic for everyone to understand. I know some will argue or state that it is hard to judge between someone who has put alot of work into there car as opposed to a store bought but if they put enough work into the car they should be able to win that categorie is my thought. For example in my faceoff with Blackjack is engine bay is insane and I have put a hell of alot of work into mine but still think he should get the nod in that are.
Just a thought thanks to all judges and keep up the good work as well